Current:Home > MarketsIs $4.3 million the new retirement number? -Thrive Success Strategies
Is $4.3 million the new retirement number?
View
Date:2025-04-16 07:57:29
One of the toughest things about saving for retirement is that it's hard to estimate how much money you'll actually need to cover your senior living costs in full. After all, there are so many factors that will go into that equation, including your retirement age, the state of your health, your desired lifestyle, and inflation, to name only some.
In fact, you'll often hear that it's wise to aim for $1 million in savings because that sum is more likely to be enough to cover your costs throughout your senior years. Or is it?
The reality is that $1 million is an easy, clean number to land on. But for many retirees, it might fall short.
In fact, in a recent New York Life survey, today's workers said it would take an average of $4,342,378.86 in savings to be able to retire comfortably. But given where savers are at today, that sort of balance may be unrealistic.
Do you really need $4.3 million in retirement?
While Americans might think it will take around $4.3 million to retire without financial worries, their current 401(k) and IRA balances tell a much different story. That's because the average saver today only has $135,161.50 socked away.
Granted, it may be possible to grow $135,000 and change into roughly $4.3 million. Let's say you're 31 years old with $135,000 in savings and you want to retire at 67, which is full retirement age for Social Security purposes. If you were to stock away $1,000 a month between now and then at an average annual 8% return, which is a bit below the stock market's average, then you'd get to $4.4 million in time for retirement.
But a lot of people can't part with $12,000 a year for retirement savings purposes. And also, a lot of people who have $135,000 and change in savings are much older than their early 30s. So for a lot of people, getting to the $4.3 million mark isn't so doable.
Of course, it's important to ask the question of whether $4.3 million is really the right number to be aiming for. And the answer is that for some people, it might be.
But again, there's no single retirement savings target that guarantees you financial security throughout your senior years. So rather than fixate on a number that a survey arrives at, a better bet is to do your own number-crunching and planning to come up with a savings goal that's likely to allow you to meet your personal needs.
Remember, someone who wants to spend retirement gardening and spending time with family might need a lot less money than someone intending to retire in a large city and enjoy nightlife all the time. So while it may not be a bad idea for you to aim for $4.3 million in savings, you also shouldn't feel compelled to.
And do keep in mind that while $4.3 million is clearly a lot of money, even that sum doesn't guarantee that you won't run out. If you aren't careful, it's possible to spend down a nest egg of any size too quickly. So no matter what savings number you land on, you should not only work your hardest to attain it, but also, manage your money strategically once retirement does roll around.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $21,756 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $21,756 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
veryGood! (66)
Related
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- This $40 Portable Vacuum With 144,600+ Five-Star Amazon Reviews Is On Sale for Just $24
- Baltimore Continues Incinerating Trash, Despite Opposition from its New Mayor and City Council
- Why platforms like HBO Max are removing streaming TV shows
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Charity Lawson Shares the Must-Haves She Packed for The Bachelorette Including a $5 Essential
- The job market slowed last month, but it's still too hot to ease inflation fears
- Maine aims to restore 19th century tribal obligations to its constitution. Voters will make the call
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Here's how much money a grocery rewards credit card can save you
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Locals look for silver linings as Amazon hits pause on its new HQ
- Anger grows in Ukraine’s port city of Odesa after Russian bombardment hits beloved historic sites
- Justice Department opens probe into Silicon Valley Bank after its sudden collapse
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- The Most Unforgettable Red Carpet Moments From BET Awards
- A Clean Energy Milestone: Renewables Pulled Ahead of Coal in 2020
- Need workers? Why not charter a private jet?
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
To Meet Paris Accord Goal, Most of the World’s Fossil Fuel Reserves Must Stay in the Ground
An Arizona woman died after her power was cut over a $51 debt. That forced utilities to change
Why the Paris Climate Agreement Might be Doomed to Fail
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Lawmakers are split on how to respond to the recent bank failures
New Florida Legislation Will Help the State Brace for Rising Sea Levels, but Doesn’t Address Its Underlying Cause
After a Clash Over Costs and Carbon, a Minnesota Utility Wants to Step Back from Its Main Electricity Supplier